For this
study, I choose the objects on my dressing table, which is an old Art Deco
piece with a mirrored back and glass top.
We are asked
to make two preliminary drawings: a linear study concentrating on the main
shapes and lines, and a tonal study. As
we are specifically asked not to make the drawings too large, I completed the
two sketches on A5 (the linear study in artliner pen and the tonal study in
charcoal pencil).
Apart from
the main objects in the composition, my main focus was the effect of light on
the objects (there being glass surfaces as well as a jam “coin” jar) and the
shadow detail, as I find these are the details which are not so easy to “make
up” if you don’t have all the necessary detail in the original sketches.
Although the
A5 sketch was OK for the linear detail, I found it hard in the tonal study (and
especially using charcoal pencil) to note the fine highlights on the glass and
reflections (eg on the beads both in the original and reflected image). I also had to add a larger amount of detail
that I would normally in a tonal sketch, purely in order to get the placing of
the highlights, etc on the mahogany dressing table set.
I also
realised after completing these drawings that although, technically you should
have enough information by completing a line and tonal drawing, the one thing
which I would struggle with would be the details in objects (specifically in
this case the jar of coins and two plastic coin bags sitting next to it) as
these details were not really included (or asked for) in either of the two
preliminary sketches.
Also, in the
colour sketch, we are asked to concentrate on the main colours by painting
boldly and not making a detailed description of the objects. Rather than getting too fiddly and detailed
in the main drawing, I think where you do have an area of high detail (such as
fabric folds or a complex object) would be to complete a more detailed study of
perhaps a section of those.
Finished
study in acrylic (45 x 60cm)
I struggled somewhat
in this painting – basically because it was such a hot day (30+) that the
acrylic paint (used neat) was pretty much drying on contact! I had planned to use a loose technique for
this exercise anyway, purely because when you are working from drawings, you do
not have the amount of detail available to you as you would if painting from
life. As it was, I used large 1” and ¾”
flat brushes for the whole painting, loaded with lots of paint just so I could
get the length of brushstrokes in. I
used a bright green ground which I thought would (1) contrast with the
red/brown tones and also provide a brightness to the yellows / blues / creams. The one area which is wrong is the angle of the mirror on the table - will need to go back and correct this.
Also, you
have to make more decisions as to what to put in and what to leave out (such as
the detail on the cosmetics) and just concentrate on the main forms and overall
tonal balance. This I think I have
achieved well – I made careful visual notes in my tonal drawing of the shadows/
reflections/ highlights so that part of the painting is fine. After starting
the painting, I decided to leave out the detail of the curtain folds reflected
in the mirror to concentrate more on the objects on the table.
I think what
I would do in future (when not restricted by the course notes!) would be to
combine the line and tonal drawing to include more detail – not necessarily on
the larger “squares and cylinder” objects as, once you have the direction of
the light, it is relatively straightforward to model the form, but on the more
complex objects (in this case jar filled with coins). I think you have to decide in advance which
areas you will find more difficult to complete “from memory / visual notes” and
work accordingly.
No comments:
Post a Comment