As I live in a bungalow,
surrounded by other bungalows with established gardens, there are not many
views from my house!
I did a number of sketches from
various windows and decided the view from my lounge window on to the back
garden offered the most interesting view in terms of framing, colour, etc. Luckily I sketched this on one of the few
recent days we have had sunshine and, as my back garden is west facing, the
early afternoon sun was coming through the windows to create contrast and
interesting shadow detail.
My original sketch comprised
the whole window, but I decided if would probably be more interesting to crop the
view to just include part of the window and to create more of a focal point on
the daffodils in a vase on the windowsill.
I also began thinking more
about the brief for the exercise. We are asked to “chose a view onto the
world”, the mood and atmosphere and whether or not to include the framework of
the window / door to make the internal / external contrast more prominent.
On the concept of “framing”, the
dictionary defines this as: to build by putting together the structural parts
of; to conceive or design; and to arrange or adjust for a purpose. All of these definitions apply to all the art
we create in one way or another – we always choose to “frame” our view in a
certain way for our own purposes.
Two artists came to mind
regarding “framing” in landscape:
The first is David Hockney,
especially his more recent works and the exhibition at the RA where his very
large landscapes were painted on a number of canvases and then formed into a
grid, creating an overall impression but each individual canvas was also a
painting in its own right. Hockney
expanded this idea further by attaching a number of cameras in a grid to the
top of a vehicle and driving around. I
found this installation fascinating – the grid pattern disrupted the eye,
forcing you to focus on the individual images and made you look around the
screen much more than a standard moving image would normally.
The second is Ben Nicholson and
his inside/outside Cornish landscapes where he minimalised both the landscape
and the still life image he placed in front of the window (frequently by just
outlining the objects). As I had objects
on the windowsill, I wondered whether I could simplify them / make them
“transparent” to focus the view on the outside.
While sat on my stool trying to
decide the way forward, I focused on the differences between the two windows I
was looking out of. Even though the view
is technically the same view, I began to see a contrast between the views from
each window:
- The view through the larger central window is much more open – you can see into next door’s garden, trees in further neighbours’ gardens and the sky. The fence separating our garden from the next faces almost due south so gets full sun and the daffodils on the window add a further splash of colour in front of the “sulphur heart” ivy, which is very bright acid green and yellows.
- The view through the furthest window is much more enclosed – next door have very large trees (mainly conifers) which take up the whole view over the fence. The large shrub/tree just over the fence is still just branches which creates a strong contrast against the very dark conifers.
The other thing I noticed by
looking closely was the way the shadows played both through the window and how
the bright sunshine changed the colour of the white window frames, putting most
of it into shadow, as well as the window recess and wall.
I wondered how best to
reinforce the “same but different” feel I was getting from this view, which is
where Hockney’s grids/frames idea came into play. I felt that if I could actually split the two
views, it would force a viewer to actually see the two views differently, as
well as it being obvious it was the same window view.
I sketched the windows on a
sheet of A5, in effect making them two paintings within one. Originally I thought of doing a diptych but
decided that two paintings “framed within a frame” would work well. My tonal biro drawing strengthened my
decision to emphasise the differences between the two scenes and encouraged me
to exaggerate the depth of shadow (especially in the far window) to create a
stronger contrast.
Almost finished painting – just
need to add a few white highlights and go over the daffodils where the pencil
marks still show:
I carefully measured the canvas
so the frame around each painting was equal and then masked off the canvas so I
could paint freely without worrying about marking the areas I wanted to leave
as bare canvas. I was careful over the
drawing stage as I wanted to make sure the perspective was accurate and the
main lines in both paintings were precise (the masking tape helped here as I
was able to create continuous lines by drawing over the tape).
The paint
was applied fairly loosely using a filbert brush and neat oils (only using
liquin on the blue fence (1) to dilute the colour slightly and (2) so it dried
quickly so I could overpaint the branches of the magnolia. The area above the ivy in the far window I
painted with a wash of beige paint so I could then overpaint the trees to
achieve finer branch detail.
This panel is the more colourful of the
two, with the strongest contrast being of the complementary colours of the
yellow against the blue fence. Even
though the outside greenery is fairly dark, the splashes of bright yellows and
greens, as well as the strong shadows on the windowsill and on the fence and
the blue sky, create the feeling of a sunny day in spring.
This panel is much darker than the first,
and so the tonal contrast here is the strongest one; the bare branches against
the very dark conifers, the dark interior walls against the window and the dark
shadow under the windowsill and radiator cover.
No comments:
Post a Comment